A Scott Pruitt Appointment Means More Mercury in Our Fish

Comment are off

By James Pew, Earthjustice

Late last year, Scientific American reported some good news. After rising relentlessly for years, the level of mercury contamination in Atlantic bluefin tuna has started to drop.

Why does this matter? When tuna eat prey animals packed full of mercury from the polluted water around them, this mercury accumulates in the tuna’s bodies. Eating tuna and other fish contaminated with mercury is how people get exposed to this toxin, which also builds up in their bodies over time.

When mercury accumulates in women’s bodies, their babies are exposed. In the U.S. alone, between 300,000 and 600,000 babies born each year are at risk of cognitive damage, including lower IQs, learning difficulty and behavioral problems, because of their exposure to mercury in the womb and when they nurse. So getting mercury out of fish and out of our diet is crucial.

All 50 states now publish warnings about the level of mercury and other toxins in the fish we eat and, in some saltwater fish like tuna, the contamination levels can be even worse. As Scientific American reports, mercury levels in Atlantic bluefin tuna had been going up for years. Scientists credit the startling reversal in this trend to a drop in mercury emissions from America’s coal-fired power plants. Part of this change is due to new EPA rules that limit power plants’ pollution.

A polluter lobbyist is not qualified to keep our air and water clean. Here’s what you should know about Pruitt and the agency he will head, if confirmed.
GAGE SKIDMORE / CC BY-SA 2.0

Earthjustice has worked to control power plants’ toxic emissions for decades. We won court decisions that forced the EPA to put strict pollution limits in place and then blocked an attempt by the George W. Bush administration to derail them. Most recently, our organization has defended these pollution limits against court challenges brought by the coal industry and its allies. We represent both large and small environmental groups, and because power plant pollution disproportionately harms communities of color, we represent the NAACP as well. Now we can see scientific evidence that the rules we’ve worked for are starting to make our planet cleaner and our children safer.

And not just from mercury. These same limits cut power plants’ emissions of lead, arsenic and other toxic metals that spew out of their stacks. And the pollution control technology that power plants install to meet the new limits reduces their fine particle pollution—preventing heart and lung damage that previously caused between 4,200 and 11,000 premature deaths in the U.S. every year.

Not all the recent news is good, however. Litigation to eliminate EPA’s pollution limits is still ongoing, and the Trump administration’s nominee to head the EPA has been an enthusiastic part of that litigation from the time the rule was issued in 2012. As Oklahoma’s attorney general, Scott Pruitt sued to eliminate EPA’s limits on power plants’ emissions. If Pruitt had his way, power plants’ fine particle pollution would resume causing thousands of preventable deaths each year, and the health risks from exposure to the mercury, lead and other toxic pollutants they emit would continue unabated.

Pruitt is a bizarre choice by any president to head the Environmental Protection Agency. Knowing what he wants to do to the safeguards that protect families from pollution makes our job—and the job of every American who cares about public health, the environment and environmental justice—very clear.

Please join Earthjustice in the fight to protect our health. Tell your senator to reject Scott Pruitt’s nomination to lead the EPA and to support the fundamental right of all people to safe food and a clean, healthy environment.

Originally posted here.

About the Author