Follow Our Latest Tweets

Your dad has:

-Made joining unions harder

-Cut overtime pay protections

-Exposed farmworkers to pesticides

-Made it legal for employers to steal tips

-Endangered chemical, poultry & pork plant workers

-Imperiled retirement savings

But sure, call it a "Pro-Worker" agenda. https://twitter.com/IvankaTrump/status/1205238584967671809

Ivanka Trump@IvankaTrump

Under our Pro-Family, Pro-Worker, Pro-American agenda, families have never had a brighter future. Since the election of @realdonaldtrump this Admin:
▪️+7 Million new jobs
▪️+14 Million career + training opportunities

As science advances, we're learning #airpollution is more dangerous than previously known. Despite this, the #Trump/#Wheeler @EPA wants to limit the science agency staff consider when setting #cleanair standards, putting our health & lives at risk. http://bit.ly/38w1WZG

Latest Regulatory News

Dec 11, 2019 - washingtonpost.com - 0
The Next Democratic President Will Face Huge Hurdles. Here’s One.

A new memo from Take Back the Court, a group that advocates for court reform, seeks to put this issue squarely on the table for discussion among the Democratic presidential candidates. “With a Democratic president in charge of the administration and the regulatory process, we can expect right wing judges and justices to resume with vigor their multi-generation battle to do away with the modern regulatory state,” the memo warns. The memo places the Democratic candidates on notice: If one is elected president, he or she will face a “highly consequential battle” in the judiciary to undercut laws that require agencies to employ a good deal of discretion and the use of “expert-driven regulation” to achieve their ends. The occasion for this warning is a recent opinion written by Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, which signaled that there may be five justices in place to carry out a long-cherished conservative effort to dramatically undercut the regulatory state.

Dec 11, 2019 - vox.com - 0
Air Pollution Is Much More Harmful Than You Know

Air pollution — mostly fine particulates, but also ozone and nitrous oxides — has risen in recent years, in part due to ongoing rollbacks of regulations relating to air pollution, leading to what a team of researchers at Carnegie Mellon estimate is nearly 10,000 extra deaths per year. Policymakers in the Trump administration seem determined to continue down this course. On November 11, Lisa Friedman of the New York Times reported on a draft memo circulating among Environmental Protection Agency officials that, if enacted, would sharply limit the kinds of scientific studies the agency can use to consider the impact of air pollution. Yet there’s good reason to believe the EPA and other global public health agencies should be moving in the opposite direction and considering a wider range of studies about the harms of air pollution. That’s because in addition to its impacts to lung and cardiovascular functioning, it seems increasingly clear that pollution has a significant effect on cognitive function over both the short and long term. A spate of studies released in recent years indicate that people work less efficiently and make more mistakes on higher-pollution days, and that long-term exposure to air pollution “ages” the brain and increases the odds of dementia. These consequences are not nearly as dramatic as dying, of course. But they are spread across a huge swath of the population. And since cognitive function is linked to almost everything else in life, the implications are potentially enormous.

Dec 11, 2019 - washingtonpost.com - 0
FDA Can Regulate E-Cigarettes Just Like Conventional Cigarettes, Appeals Court Says

The Food and Drug Administration can regulate e-cigarettes like it does conventional cigarettes, an appeals court said Tuesday, finding that the products are “indisputably highly addictive and pose health risks, especially to youth, that are not well understood.” The case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, brought by an e-cigarette manufacturer, was not about banning the sale of the devices and did not pose the question of whether e-cigarettes are more or less safe than traditional cigarettes. The issue for the court was whether the FDA has the authority to treat e-cigarettes as “tobacco products” and to subject the vaping products to the same set of rules and regulations as their conventional counterparts. The case is the first to be decided by a federal appeals court, among a set of lawsuits filed throughout the country.

Latest Blogs From Our Coalition Members

Setting the Stage for Another Trump Shutdown

Comment are off
By David Rosen, Public Citizen The possibility of another Trump Shutdown is growing, and it’s proof that some people never learn from their mistakes – even extremely painful ones. Government shutdowns happen when Congress and the White House are unable to reach agreement on a set of 12 annual spending... Continue Reading
Continue Reading

Congress Misses the Mark on PFAS in the NDAA

Comment are off
By Genna Reed, Union of Concerned Scientists This year’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has turned out to be a missed opportunity for a full-on government effort to do its job of protecting us. While we had high hopes for a strong compromise based on draft language adopted this summer, Congress has... Continue Reading
Continue Reading

The Trump Administration Is Poised to Gut Environmental Review. What’s at Stake?

Comment are off
By Sally Hardin and Claire Moser, Center for American Progress In the coming weeks, the Trump administration is poised to make some major changes to how much—or more likely, how little—environmental review and public input is required for federal projects, including for roads and bridges, oil and gas development, and pipeline construction. In yet...
Continue Reading
The Coalition for Sensible Safeguards is a national alliance of more than 160 organizations, representing millions of Americans.

We are committed to strengthening public protections, encouraging sound enforcement and repelling the ongoing attacks against commonsense regulatory safeguards.

Learn more about our mission, meet our experts and view our latest press releases.